Web24 mrt. 2024 · By definition, the values in a factor vector are of nominal class, which means there is no meaningful ordering of the values. Thus, there is no ‘max’ value to be found. … Webmaximum, In mathematics, a point at which a function’s value is greatest. If the value is greater than or equal to all other function values, it is an absolute maximum. If it is …
Help with "Error in Summary.factor(..., na.rm = na.rm) : "max" not ...
Web9 nov. 2024 · In Ops.factor(left, right) : ‘/’ not meaningful for factors. After hours, and somehow, I rewrited it in the same way but now this time, it worked! I don't know why this happened... Now I'm trying to make an RMarkdown and I'm running all the codes to make sure everything is fine, and now it's happening again... Web20 mrt. 2024 · Some of these do not make sense at first, but that changes once you understand it. The “not meaningful for factors” warning message is an example of this type. When is the Max of a factor not meaningful? This simply indicates that you are attempting to take the ‘max’ of a variable that is of the class factor. google earth usgs topo layer
[R] Error in Summary.factor(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L ...
WebHola F?tima, I think the problem is that your class labels (rmadata2$Genotype) are a factor, but they should be a vector of integers starting at 0. Web11 mrt. 2024 · Error in Summary.factor(c(8L, 175L, 1L, 140L, 8L, 1L, 1L, 140L, 1L, 1L, : ‘sum’ not meaningful for factors. column_sums <- colSums(data$a, data$b) Error in … Web2 mrt. 2024 · $\begingroup$ @painintheass this is a bit strange because my code works in recent versions of R, you can try it in the browser here.So I suspect that the issue has something to do with the version of R that you're using. Anyway I edited my code to try to solve the factor issue, but it's hard to know if it works since I don't have the bug myself. … chicago pd chasing ghosts